Legal Opinion

Nagobich v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on or about September 18, 1992, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination that petitioner had willfully overcharged the complaining tenant, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, the petition is granted to the extent of annulling the determination that the overcharge was willful, and the matter is remitted for further proceedings, to recalculate the amount of the overcharge without costs.

Contrary to respondent’s arguments on appeal,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. GliedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Round Hill Management Co. v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roker Realty Corp. v. GrossAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995
  2. East 163rd Street LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 2004
  3. 789 St. Marks Realty Corp. v. Commissioner of the Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Matter of EAST 163rd St. LLC v. N. Y. State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court, Bronx County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API