Legal Opinion
Federoff v. Ewing
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1971No. 23 October Term 1971, Docket Nos. 53,197, 53,198PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
By these separately reviewed and appellate-consolidated proceedings each plaintiff seeks to obtain continued payment of his adjudicated right to workmen’s compensation. Each is totally, permanently and tragically disabled as a result of work-connected accidental injuries occurring in 1959 and 1960. Different employers are liable respectively for payment of such benefits. We surmise both are now uncollectible. Each carried direct coverage under Part IV of the Workmen’s Compensation Act with Highway Insurance Company. There is no question of the right of either plaintiff to benefits overdue and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- First National Bank of Kansas City v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Mahoney v. Lincoln Brick Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Feldman v. Stein Building & Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Robert K. Myers v. Western-Southern Life Insurance Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Badon v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Arrow Trucking Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Kewin v. Board of Education of the Melvindale-Northern Allen Park Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.