Adams v. Directors of Insane Asylum
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the-Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. A. C. Baber, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBethune, J.
On the nineteenth day of May, 1888, I. S. Titus was appointed by the board of directors of the insane-asylum of this territory the resident physician and superintendent thereof, and performed tlu; duties of said office from the first day of June, 1888, when lie qualified, until the nineteenth day of June, 1890, when it iras adjudged by the district court of the second judicial district of this territory in and for the county of Maricopa that ¡¡aid Titus was not legally entitled to hold said office, on the ground that the governor-*329of the territory alone had power to appoint a person thereto…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Behan v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Elledge v. WhartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Eubank v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Baca v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
- Juliani v. DarrowArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Reherd v. MandersDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.