Legal Opinion

Hill v. Murphy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 12, 1973No. 57075PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

This is an appeal from the order dismissing the petition for a writ of mandamus and injunctive relief pendente lite on the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action and is moot as alleged in defendants’ motion to strike and dismiss.

The court found:

1. That the 1972 budget of the City of Chicago had been passed into law by the City Council of the City of Chicago.

2. That the relief sought by plaintiffs in their complaint is moot.

3. That as a matter of law section 42 of the Meetings of Public Agencies Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 102, sec. 42) does not apply to defendants as members of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. The People v. RedlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People Ex Rel. Cairo Turf Club, Inc. v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Wick v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kohan v. Rimland School for Autistic ChildrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Weigel v. O'CONNORAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. People v. BlaylockIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API