Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Corrigan v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 5, 2016No. 2D14-3208Published

1ConcurrenceLucas, Judge

Today the court ensures that we -continue-along a well-worn road of standing law» in mortgage foreclosure proceedihgs. Because we must hew to the route laid before us, I concur with the court’s decision. But I question the rationale of applying the affirmative defense 'of standing as if it were a jurisdictional prerequisité in cases such as these. Our courts’ unwavering adherence to this standing-at-inception requirement imposes inequities in foreclosure cases and, in my opinion, has led the rule astray from whatever its underlying purpose may have been. We ought to change course.

I

In recent…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. RaftogianisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  2. Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Riggs v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Dean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Hayes v. Guardianship of ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API