Corrigan v. Bank of America, N.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceLucas, Judge
Today the court ensures that we -continue-along a well-worn road of standing law» in mortgage foreclosure proceedihgs. Because we must hew to the route laid before us, I concur with the court’s decision. But I question the rationale of applying the affirmative defense 'of standing as if it were a jurisdictional prerequisité in cases such as these. Our courts’ unwavering adherence to this standing-at-inception requirement imposes inequities in foreclosure cases and, in my opinion, has led the rule astray from whatever its underlying purpose may have been. We ought to change course.
I
In recent…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Bank of New York v. RaftogianisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Riggs v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Dean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hayes v. Guardianship of ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.