Legal Opinion

Mielke v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1978No. Docket No. 30914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from an order granting plaintiffs summary judgment motion on the basis that the governmental benefits set-off provision of Michigan’s no-fault insurance act, MCLA 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), is unconstitutional. Defendant, plaintiffs insurer, reduced payments due plaintiff by the amount of Social Security survivor’s benefits received by plaintiff.

This case is controlled by Pollock v Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co, 79 Mich App 218; 261 NW2d 554 (1977). Pollock involved a set-off for workmen’s compensation benefits. Its reasoning is equally applicable to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pollock v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mielke v. MICH. MILLERS MUTUAL INS. CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API