Mielke v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals as of right from an order granting plaintiffs summary judgment motion on the basis that the governmental benefits set-off provision of Michigan’s no-fault insurance act, MCLA 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), is unconstitutional. Defendant, plaintiffs insurer, reduced payments due plaintiff by the amount of Social Security survivor’s benefits received by plaintiff.
This case is controlled by Pollock v Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Co, 79 Mich App 218; 261 NW2d 554 (1977). Pollock involved a set-off for workmen’s compensation benefits. Its reasoning is equally applicable to a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pollock v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mielke v. MICH. MILLERS MUTUAL INS. CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978