Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Cotton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Greene Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Tiiohas Cobbs. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKELL, O. J.

The purpose of the original bill, filed on 21st October, 1881, is the specific performance of a contract, made and entered into on the first day of January, 1867, by which the defendant in writing bound himself, and covenanted that he would convey to the ancestor of the complainants five hundred acres of a larger tract of land, when he could ascertain the numbers thereof. The defendant remained in the open, notorious, continuous possession of the entire tract,, taking the rents and profits, claiming title, and exercising acts of ownership. The ancestor of the complainants died…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peters v. . DelaplaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Garnett v. YoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Haynes v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1837
  4. Greene v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McFadden & Bro. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Howard v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Gilmer v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Springer v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Lightsey v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API