Legal Opinion

Nadler v. Okarma

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1966No. 42068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Franiojm, Judge.

The evidence adduced on the trial of this case was not taken down by a court reporter. Counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant were unable to agree upon a brief of the evidence. The trial judge was requested to con*276duct a hearing for the purpose of “settling the brief of evidence,” which request was granted, and at said hearing, the trial judge refused to approve the proposed brief of evidence, and thereupon denied the appellant’s motion for a new trial which was based upon the usual general grounds only. Under these facts, which are conceded by counsel for the appellant in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buffington v. Ray-O-Lite Southeast, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Anderson v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Anderson v. OakleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API