Legal Opinion
Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. Raborn
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 25, 1937No. 1 Div. 958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The questions presented are by way of certiorari to the Court of Appeals.
The petition contains, among other ground now to be decided, the following:
“1. The Court of Appeals erred in holding that parol evidence is admissible to show that the bond introduced in evidence in this case is the one covered by the agreement of indemnity, although there is a substantial inconsistency between the bond introduced in evidence and the bond described in the agreement of indemnity.”
“4. The Court of Appeals erred in failing to hold that the defendant, William Raborn, was entitled to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Formby v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Watt's Ex'rs. v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Brayn's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Adams v. M'MillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- Giles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Borden v. CaseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Waters v. W. O. Wood Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. DiggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. HorkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. RabornAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937