Legal Opinion

Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Broadway-Cortlandt Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1911Published

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the City Court of the city of blew York denying its motion for judgment for the. amount demanded in the second and third causes of action alleged in the complaint and a severance of the action.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The complaint alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action alleged is based upon a written contract between the parties under which the plaintiff agreed to install a vacuum cleaner system. The’second and third *482causes of action are for labor and materials furnished. The . answers of the defendants deny performance of the contract alleged in the first cause of action. .The answers also plead as a complete defense to the causes of action set forth in the complaint that the Hedden Construction Company as agent for defendant entered into a contract with the plaintiff for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cronin v. TeboNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API