Robinson v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER COURT TRIAL
JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
This is an action pursuant to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. In this action, plaintiff Edythe B. Robinson (“Robinson”) seeks to recover benefits she contends were wrongfully denied by defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”), acting as claims administrator for defendant Things Remembered, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan. The parties submitted the Administrative Record, briefs, and proposed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.