Legal Opinion

De Hierapolis v. . Reilly

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

. Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 17, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants Reilly et ah, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.

Read the full summary

. Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 17, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants Reilly et ah, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term. The following is the question certified: The defendant Reilly being entitled to receive, on attaining the age of twenty-one years, a sum on deposit in the Kings County Trust Company, amounting to about five thousand dollars, in April, 1895, he being then under the age of twenty-one years, verbally asked the…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landos, Cullen and Werner, JJ.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Hermann v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Enthoven v. EnthovenNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sardis v. FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Adams v. SwiftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API