Legal Opinion

Curti v. Pacific Mtg. Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1936No. 8194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

Reversal is sought of a judgment of dismissal of a complaint challenging the sale of real estate hypothecated to secure payment of money at a stated time by virtue of a power of sale contained in the agreement of hypothecation pursuant to the provisions of section 2924 of the Civil Code of California, charging that said section violated the “due process” clause of the Constitution of the United States (Const. Amend. 14), the hypothecation being made for security only, and that the procedure to enforce the contract must be by judicial procedure and sale upon execution…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co. v. LyndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Scott v. PaisleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Bell Silver & Copper Mining Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lancaster Security Investment Corp. v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Strutt v. Ontario Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Logan v. ShortDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API