Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense, *124and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.
We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marquis v. McKaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- County Savings Bank v. GilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Beck v. SchekterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Helfenstein v. Line Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Fawley v. Hessin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1928
- Marx v. Perrus, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1927
- Mehrkam v. Schlegel & Williamson, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1924