Legal Opinion

Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeals, Nos. 174 and 175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense, *124and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.

We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marquis v. McKaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. County Savings Bank v. GilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Beck v. SchekterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Helfenstein v. Line Mountain Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Fawley v. Hessin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1928
  3. Marx v. Perrus, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1927
  4. Mehrkam v. Schlegel & Williamson, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API