Legal Opinion

Matter of Jamal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Following an allocution in which he admitted his participation, respondent was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent on the basis of acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of fourth degree grand larceny (Penal Law § 155.30). On this appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the dispositional order of the Family Court, respondent con tends that the courts below erred in refusing to suppress evidence of a pretrial identification procedure that was conducted in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. CoatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. LaClereNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re Nicomedes F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. People v. MaloneNew York Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API