Legal Opinion

County of Broome v. County of Cortland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, the County of Cortland, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Broome on the 16th day of February, 1912, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Broome Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, J.:

Oscar Austin and his family of four children were natives of Lisle, Broome county, and resided there without material *350interruption until March 12, 1909. Therefore, they had a legal settlement in that town under section 40 of the Poor Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 42; Laws of 1909, chap. 46), and such settlement continued until they had gained a like settlement in some other town or city by a residence of a year. (Id. §40.)

Prom about March 12, 1909, to" about the middle of October, 1909, they resided in the county of Tioga, and from the latter date. until the family returned to Lisle,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Delaware v. Town of DelawareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Manlius v. Town of PompeyNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Town of Kiantone v. County of ChautauquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API