Legal Opinion

Sussex Bank v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 15, 1840PublishedCited by 1 opinion

iu case, on rule to show cause against a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDayton, J.

This case, was tried at the Sussex Circuit of May, A. B. 1838, and verdict had for the plaintiff. Sundry reasons are now relied upon to set the same aside, and I will consider them in their order. .

The defendants are the indorsers of a promissory note made by Conrad Teese, October 24, 1836, for five hundred and five dollars and sixty-one cents, payable six months after date to the order of Wm. A. Baldwin, & Co., (the defendants,) and by them indorsed to the plaintiff. The first reason assigned is, that the note was not duly presented to the maker, for payment. That it was presented at an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
Thornton v. WynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
Williams v. Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
President of the Bank of Alexandria v. SwannSupreme Court of the United States · 1835

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Ditmars v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950