Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Dereiko

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1936No. 26258. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

—This is an action for damages on account of injuries sustained by plaintiff Doreen Barlow, as the result of a collision with defendants’ automobile. The collision occurred on Sunset highway within the corporate limits of the town of Issaquah, at a point about three hundred feet west of the intersection of the highway with Front street—the principal cross street of the town. From Front street, the highway extends westerly on a tangent for more than a thousand feet. The pavement, twenty feet wide, is flanked on each side by twelve-foot parking strips, which in turn are flanked by concrete…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franey v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Wickman v. LundyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Haydon v. Bay City Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pritchard v. HockettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Sasse v. Hale Morton Taxi and Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sodden v. ReinhardtWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API