Legal Opinion
Ex parte Ow Guen
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 20, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
The relator is a Chinaman, and came to the United States about 1885, and in 1893 appears to have some interest with his uncle as a merchant in Boston, and for that reason did not become registered as a laborer. Afterwards he was for several years a laundryman at Lowell, till 1901, when he became a merchant there and was engaged wholly in that business, having over $1,500 capital of his own therein and three partners having in it $800, $700, and $500, respectively. In 1903 he went to China, leaving affidavits of two white witnesses as to his being a merchant at Lowell,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Sing Tuck or King Do & Thirty-OneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gin Dock Sue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- United States v. Lou KingDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Ng Gun Yow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942