Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Garletts

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1923No. 2; Appeal, 107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The defendant, a justice of the peace, was convicted in. the court below upon an indictment charging extortion. The only ruling of the court below, upon the trial, assigned for error, is the refusal to quash the indictment. The principal reason urged in the motion to quash was that: “The grand jury which found and returned the said indictment to the court was not a legal grand jury, in that it was drawn from a wheel which contained only the names of male electors of Fayette County, and from which all female electors of said county were excluded.”

The defendant, in support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Commonwealth v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Klemmer v. Mount Penn Gravity R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Commonwealth v. HegedusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NeffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Commonwealth v. DucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API