Legal Opinion

Craver v. Craver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 7822SC462PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The motion in this case was purportedly made under Rule 56. There is nothing in the record for us to consider except the pleadings. We shall consider the motion as if it were made under *607Rule 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings. See Reichler v. Tillman, 21 N.C. App. 38, 203 S.E. 2d 68 (1974).

This appeal brings to the Court the question of whether a tenant in common in possession of property by court order may make repairs to the property and charge a proportional part of the costs of the repairs to the co-tenant. This question has not been previously decided in the state. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reichler v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Jenkins v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Holt v. . CouchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gillmor v. GillmorUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Knotts v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API