Legal Opinion
De Mayo v. Rensselaer Polytech Institute
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 3, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 16, 1987, which directed the Special Fund for Reopened Cases to pay claimant a penalty under Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (former [3] [c]).
Claimant sustained a work-related injury in August 1974 and received workers’ compensation benefits until November of that year. In January 1983, the Workers’ Compensation Board reopened the case based on a medical report which *741indicated that claimant was presently suffering from a disabling condition related to his prior injury. Following a hearing, claimant was awarded a 30% schedule…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Matter of Hart v. PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Claim of White v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Claim of Scheib v. Milton Herman ManagementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- De Mayo v. Rensselaer Polytech InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Judd v. ConstantineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990