Legal Opinion
Cootz v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1989No. 18118Published
1Opinion of the Court
785 P.2d 163 (1989)
117 Idaho 38
Anthony G. COOTZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Idaho, Respondent.
No. 18118.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
December 21, 1989.
Anthony G. Cootz, Boise, pro se.
Jim Jones, Atty. Gen., Timothy D. Wilson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for respondent. Heard on the briefs.
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a prisoner's rights case. In reaching our decision we must first determine whether the scope of the due process clause of our state constitution is the same as that of the due process clause of the federal constitution. We hold that our due process clause does not necessarily have the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States ex rel. Miller v. TwomeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.