Legal Opinion
Malbin v. Martz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*716When a party seeks to modify the child support provision of a prior order or judgment, including an order or judgment incorporating without merging an agreement or stipulation of the parties, he or she must demonstrate a substantial change in circumstances (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b] [2] [i]; Matter of Brescia v Fitts, 56 NY2d 132, 140-141 [1982]; Matter of Fantel v Stamatatos, 59 AD3d 717 [2009]; Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]; Matter of Love v Love, 303 AD2d 756 [2003]). “It is the burden of the moving party to establish the change in circumstance[s]…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Klapper v. KlapperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Beard v. BeardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Talty v. TaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Davis v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atabay v. CinarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- McCormick v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Atabay v. CinarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- McCormick v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012