Legal Opinion

Campagna v. City of Baton Rouge

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 12, 1928No. 28701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The opinion of the trial judge correctly states and disposes of the issues herein involved, and we adopt it as our own, as follows:

Opinion of Trial Judge.

This is a suit attacking the constitutionality of Act 239 of 1926, known as the “illumination district, or white way statute,” and, indirectly, certain ordinances of the commission council of the city of Baton Rouge enacted thereunder.

The grounds of attack are numerous, but only three are pressed or argued in extenso in plaintiff’s brief. The other grounds, apparently without merit, will be dismissed from further consideration.

In examining…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. De HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Roberts v. Evangeline Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Thornhill v. WearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Porter v. Town of v. Lle PlatteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Fristoe v. City of CrowleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davenport v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Barnett v. Sewerage & Water BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API