Legal Opinion

Felder v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1925No. 3 Div. 496PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The controlling question presented upon this appeal is, Did this appellant, defendant below, conspire with1 one Oliver Ware to steal the 100 pounds of sugar in question from the store of C. D. Kenny Company, a corporation. Under the law, if there was no such conspiracy, the judgment of conviction for grand larceny rendered against appellant cannot stand, for, in the absence of an agreement between these parties to commit the larceny charged, the undisputed facts vadduced upon this trial do not and cannot constitute the offense of grand larceny upon the part of this appellant. In the first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Bardeleben v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Driver v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Dillehay v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Caraway v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Whitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Hale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Huff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API