Legal Opinion

Cumberland & Erly, LLC v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 3, 2015No. Civil Action No. RDB-14-2399Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.

Plaintiff Cumberland & Erly, LLC (“C & E” or “Plaintiff’) brings this diversity action against Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide” or “Defendant”), seeking a declaratory judgment in its favor pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Essentially, C & E claims that Nationwide breached the terms of the insurance policy held by C & E (the “Policy”) by failing to compensate C & E for a claim arising under the Employee Dishonesty Coverage. This claim arose after the theft by an employee of $157,268.75 from a trust account. C & E asks…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Thomas W. Gresham v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API