Fletcher v. Blair
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentPowers, Justice
The majority purport to nullify (“vacate”) a trial-court judgment without first finding that it results from reversible error; indeed, the majority do so consciously and expressly without “addressing the merits of the appeal.” We have no power to nullify in this manner a trial-court judgment that is presumed on appeal to be free of error and valid in all respects. I therefore dissent.
THE MAJORITY OPINION
Fletcher perfected an appeal from a trial-court default judgment imposed as a discovery sanction. She contended the judgment was erroneous under TransAmerican Natural Gas v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Lone Star Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.