Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fletcher v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 12, 1992No. 3-91-077-CVPublished

1DissentPowers, Justice

The majority purport to nullify (“vacate”) a trial-court judgment without first finding that it results from reversible error; indeed, the majority do so consciously and expressly without “addressing the merits of the appeal.” We have no power to nullify in this manner a trial-court judgment that is presumed on appeal to be free of error and valid in all respects. I therefore dissent.

THE MAJORITY OPINION

Fletcher perfected an appeal from a trial-court default judgment imposed as a discovery sanction. She contended the judgment was erroneous under TransAmerican Natural Gas v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lone Star Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API