Daniels v. Creekmore
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from Erath. Tried below before Hon. C. K. Bell.
1Opinion of the Court
HEAD, Associate Justice.
Our conclusions of fact in this case can best be stated in connection with our conclusions of law upon the several questions presented by the assignments, and this course will therefore be adopted.
At the October Term, 1889, of the court below, the trial of this case was entered upon, and after plaintiffs in error had closed their evidence, the defendants in error offered evidence to establish the execution by Mrs. Hardinge and husband of the deed under which they claimed, which was excluded, because no sufficient predicate had been laid. Defendants in error were then,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bounds v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Parks v. CaudleTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Overand v. MenczerTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Crain v. HuntingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Sweeney v. JarvisTexas Supreme Court · 1851
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hill v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Fidelity Lumber Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Simpson v. EdensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Lancaster v. Whaley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- McCardell v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.