Legal Opinion
Rogan v. Consolidated Coppermines Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Action to recover on promissory note. Motion for summary judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff has brought an action as assignee of a note made and executed by the defendant. The complaint alleges that the note was made and delivered at Chicago, 111. The answer denies that the note was made and delivered in the city of Chicago or elsewhere in the state of Illinois and “ denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief ” as to the allegations concerning the assignment and the answer further contains an affirmative defense *720that the note was made and delivered in New York city and that the payee is doing business in the city of New York and has not obtained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wayland v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Dahlstrom v. . GemunderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Harley v. . PlantNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- de Cordova v. SanvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- De Cordova v. . SanvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
- H. C. King Motor Sales Corp. v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Woodmere Academy v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Dolge v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.