Bolt v. Bolt

The parties were divorced on August 1, 1980, following a trial in the Wayne County Circuit Court. All claims on appeal center on the division of the marital assets. Because of unresolved issues concerning whether defendant’s interest in a pension plan established by his employer, Daniel International Corporation, should be considered a marital asset, this matter must be remanded for further consideration.

The trial court specifically found that the pension plan in issue did not constitute a distributable marital asset. In reaching this conclusion, the court relied on Miller v Miller, 83 Mich…