State v. Contraras
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
Granting a defense motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant Contraras, the trial court found:
[T]he actions of the officers in stopping the Defendant were done for the purpose of searching the bag and its contents. The officers intended to search the bag even though they did not have probable cause to conduct such *340search. Moreover, the Court finds that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to believe the Defendant was engaged in illegal activity, and they were acting on a mere hunch. The hunch of the officers was not based upon an artic-ulable reasonable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Coladonato v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Kayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Alberty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988