Legal Opinion
Doig v. Cascaddan
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1997No. 96-373PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
The respondent, Darleen H. Doig, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the District Court for the First Judicial District in Broadwater County. The appellants, Gordon D. Cascaddan and Joan L. Cascaddan, counterclaimed and sought damages for various alleged breaches of contract. Following a trial by jury, the District Court entered judgment for Cascaddans in the amount of $1,000, and awarded attorney fees to Doig as the prevailing party. Cascaddans appeal. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.
The issues on appeal are:
1. Did the District Court err when it denied Cascaddans’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- E.C.A Environmental Management Services, Inc. v. ToenyesMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PeaseMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Wilkerson v. Sch. Dist. No. 15, Glacier Cty.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re the Marriage of CarasMontana Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Delaware v. K-Decorators, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
- Dimarzio v. Crazy Mountain Construction, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- Transaction Network, Inc. v. Wellington Technologies, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
- David W. v. Paramount Homes, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Bugger v. McGoughMontana Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.