Legal Opinion

Bash v. Hade

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 14, 1952No. 48117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWennebstrum, J.

The plaintiff, Ruth Bash, brought an action for damages against H. B. Hade dba Hade Motor Company and also against Hermit P. Hanaphy as the result of an automobile collision between a car in which she was a passenger and a car then operated by Hanaphy. Prior to the time of the trial the plaintiff dismissed her action against Hanaphy. The circumstances of the automobile collision by which the plaintiff claims she was injured are not herein involved. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, Hade, at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence. Subsequently a motion for new trial was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Craddock v. BickelhauptSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Tigue Sales Co. v. Reliance Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Crescent Chevrolet Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Sempel v. Northern Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Verlinden v. GodbersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bash v. HadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. King Ex Rel. King v. MacK International Motor Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API