Peterson v. Hoftiezer
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit 'Court, Hamlin County. Hon. Cari, G. Sherwood, Judge. Action; by P. H. Peterson, against G. J. Hoftiezer, upon a promissorj'- note. Prom a judgment for defendant, and from, an • order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit 'Court, Hamlin County. Hon. Cari, G. Sherwood, Judge. Action; by P. H. Peterson, against G. J. Hoftiezer, upon a promissorj'- note. Prom a judgment for defendant, and from, an • order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (4) T01 point four of the opinion, Respondent cited: 18 Cyc. ]37&- (5) To point five of the opinion, Appellant cited: Kirby v. United iStates, 174 U. 'S. 47, 43 Co-op. 890. Respondent cited: Donovan v. Purtell (111.) 1 E. R. A. (N. S.) 176, and note; First Nat. Bank v. F. C. Trebein Co., 59 Ohio St. 316, 52 N. E. 834; Cook on Corporation, Yol. II. (5th…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
Action upon a promissory note, negotiable in form, executed to the Farmers’ General Service Company as payee; plaintiff claiming the right to recover as an innocent purchaser for value and before maturity. Verdict and judgment were for the defendant, and from the judgment and an order denying a new trial this appeal was taken.
[1] From a judgment rendered on a former trial an appca] was taken to this court, our decision being found in Peterson v. Hoftiezer, 35 S. D. 101, 150 N. W. 934. Reference is made thereto' for a statement of the nature of the defense then inter' posed and of the grounds…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Donovan v. PurtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Peterson v. HoftiezerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915