Legal Opinion

Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Terrell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1888No. 2501PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. Benton Randolph. This was a suit for damages resulting from personal injuries inflicted through the alleged negligence of appellant while appellee was a passenger on its road. The verdict was for the appellee for twenty-three thousand five hundred and seventy-five dollars. In view of the opinion, the facts in evidence are unimportant.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee. What purported to be the statement of facts found in the record has been stricken out on motion and therefore many of the assignments of error can not be considered. Before the jury were empaneled one of the jurors for the week answered upon his voir dire that he was a brother-in-law to plaintiff — “ that they had married sisters.” He was challenged for cause and held to have been a competent juror by the court and this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Ezell v. DodsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Simpson v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Gallagher v. BowieTexas Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Compton v. HenrieTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hyundai Motor Co. v. VasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Snow v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  4. Wolf v. PerrymanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Schultze v. McLearyTexas Supreme Court · 1889

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API