Rushmore Investment Advisors, Inc. v. Frey
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice WHITTINGTON.
Rushmore Investment Advisors, Inc., appeals the trial court’s order granting Melody Frey’s special appearance and dismissing Rushmore’s claims against Frey. In six issues, Rushmore complains the trial judge erred in granting Frey’s special appearance because the facts support both general and specific jurisdiction, the trial court’s assertion of jurisdiction over Frey would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice, and Frey failed to meet her burden of negating all basis of personal jurisdiction. Because we conclude the trial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Information Services Group, Inc. v. Rawlinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Adam C. Leonard v. Salinas Concrete, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Turman v. POS Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Andrew J. Norstrud v. Anna and John Cicur, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
- Environmental 360, Inc. v. WalkerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.