Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Kenny

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1954No. 18602PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

1-6. The rulings announced in headnotes 1 through 6 do not require elaboration.

7. Under the uncontradicted evidence, the petitioners and the defendants, as purchasers of their respective lots abutting on Grand Avenue, acquired title to the lots, and the fee in the land embraced in Grand Avenue became vested in the respective parties as owners of the abutting lots to the middle of the street, subject to the rights-of-way over the same, in favor of all purchasers of lots in the subdivision for the purposes of ingress and egress to and from their lots. Tietjen v. Meldrim, 169 Ga.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Mayor of Forsyth v. HooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Compton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Head v. CrouchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Community Renewal & Redemption, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Halpern v. THE LACY INVEST. CORP.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Williams v. BlantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Levin v. MyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API