Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ames v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1938No. 26519. En BancPublished

1DissentBlake, J.

(dissenting) — As I see it, this decision proscribes traumatic neurasthenia as a compensable injury under • the industrial insurance act, notwithstanding the court has long recognized the condition as an injury for which alone substantial damages should be allowed. Edwards v. Seattle etc. R. Co., 62 Wash. 77, 113 Pac. 563; Eoff v. Spokane etc. R. Co., 70 Wash. 270, 126 Pac. 533; Pierce v. Seattle Electric Co., 78 Wash. 167, 138 Pac. 666; Mickelson v. Fischer, 81 Wash. 423, 142 Pac. 1160; Carton v. Eyres & Seattle Drayage Co., 117 Wash. 536, 201 Pac. 737.

That claimant is suffering from what we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mickelson v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Pierce v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Edwards v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Eoff v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Carton v. Eyres & Seattle Drayage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API