Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Ellison
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I concur in the result. I think there was error in giving the instruction submitting the issue of the railroad’s failure to comply with the lookout statute, but I do not think appellants have any standing to raise the question.
In my opinion, the undisputed evidence eliminated the lookout question entirely. The train consisted of 89 cars and 4 diesel power units. It was equipped with air braking system. At least one-half to three-fourths of a second is required for one operating the engine to perceive danger and three-fourths to one second for reaction and movement to the emergency system. Six…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. DoyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Railway Co. v. DoddSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
- Blytheville, Leachville & Arkansas Southern Railway Co. v. GessellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Dunnington v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.