Legal Opinion

Fernandez (Jose) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2013No. 59893Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

trial. Fernandez responded that he did not know to notice the witness because he just learned about the information. During jury deliberations Fernandez obtained a three-page signed statement from the inmate describing the eyewitness' confession in detail. After two days of deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts. "This court reviews the district court's decision regarding a motion for continuance for an abuse of discretion." Rose v. State, 123 Nev. 194, 206,

163 P.3d 408, 416

(2007). "Each case turns on its own particular facts, and much weight is given to the reasons…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Valdez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rose v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Summers v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API