Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1982No. 48252-7PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In justice court, the petitioner was found guilty of having assaulted one Sharon, a 38-year-old retarded person under the petitioner's care at Fircrest School in Seattle. A trial de novo in the Superior Court resulted in a guilty verdict, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The facts of the case are set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, State v. Smith, 30 Wn. App. 251, 633 P.2d 137 (1981), and need not be repeated here.

The petitioner challenges the holding of the Court of Appeals that Sharon was competent to testify. She maintains that Sharon, having an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MoorisonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. FroehlichWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HardungWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. WyseWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. State v. PhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. State v. BrousseauWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. BrousseauWashington Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API