Eric Ramone Sharkey v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Dissent
KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:
¶47. A prejudicial error occurred in this case. During voir dire examination, the prosecutor informed the potential jurors that Eric Sharkey's co-indictees already had pled guilty to the crime for which Sharkey was about to be tried. The circuit court took no curative action, even after one venireman announced-in the presence of the entire venire -his inability to be fair and impartial in light of "the other two being convicted." This Court's precedent directs us to reverse under these circumstances. With much respect to my learned colleagues, I dissent.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- United States v. Billy Edward Davis, Sr., and Dennis Bates FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Rufus Eafie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Hannah v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.