Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eric Ramone Sharkey v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2019No. 2017-KA-01353-SCTPublished

1Dissent

KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶47. A prejudicial error occurred in this case. During voir dire examination, the prosecutor informed the potential jurors that Eric Sharkey's co-indictees already had pled guilty to the crime for which Sharkey was about to be tried. The circuit court took no curative action, even after one venireman announced-in the presence of the entire venire -his inability to be fair and impartial in light of "the other two being convicted." This Court's precedent directs us to reverse under these circumstances. With much respect to my learned colleagues, I dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. United States v. Billy Edward Davis, Sr., and Dennis Bates FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. Rufus Eafie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Hannah v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  5. William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API