Legal Opinion
Roger D. Silk v. Baron Bond
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 29, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00625Unknown
1Opinion
O 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 ROGER D. SILK, Case № 2:21-cv-03977-ODW (JPRx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. TRANSFER [53] 14 BARON BOND et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Defendants Baron Bond and Howard Miller move to transfer this action to the 19 United States District Court for the District of Maryland, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1404(a). (Mot. Transfer (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 53.) Defendants argue that 21 a transfer is necessary for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and in the 22…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hatch v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.