Williams v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Learned counsel contends that the evidence which we have set out in considerable detail and which we consider an accurate survey of what each witness testified, is insufficient. We have set out the evidence for the reason that the claimant contends that an award was demanded in his favor against the defendants, while on the other hand, counsel for the defendants contend that the evidence was conflicting and, therefore, the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation as a fact-*415finding body were authorized to find that there was competent evidence to sustain the award against the claimant. It will…