Legal Opinion

Henry v. Namm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding by the District Attorney of Suffolk County pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, (1) to prohibit the respondent Stuart Namm, a Judge of the County Court, Suffolk County, from conducting a hearing in a pending criminal action entitled People v Brensic (indictment No. 2678/79) upon the motion of the defendant in that action to dismiss the indictment based upon prosecutorial misconduct, (2) to compel the respondent Namm to quash certain subpoenas issued to the petitioner with respect to a hearing on that motion, (3) to compel the respondent Namm to “define and limit the scope of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Lipari v. OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Ladone v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Spota v. BressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeFilippo v. RooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API