Legal Opinion

Central Forwarding, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1983No. Nos. 81-4437, 81-4493 and 82-4019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals challenge an Interstate Commerce Commission regulation requiring carriers to reimburse owner-operators for a portion of their fuel costs. Having concluded that the Commission exceeded its statutory authority, we set aside the regulation, suspending the effectiveness of our decision for 60 days following the date of issuance of the mandate, and remand to the Commission in order that the parties may accordingly seek leasing agreements and adjustment of rates. Although our ultimate holding is a narrow one, constrained by particular circumstances,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central Forwarding, Inc. And Household Goods Carriers' Bureau, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Eastern Labor Advisory Association and Southern Tank Line Carriers v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Drug and Toilet Preparation Traffic Conference, Inc. And the National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API