Legal Opinion
United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 14, 1953No. Civ. A. 1216PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
COMPARISON OF THE ECONOMIC AND LEGAL CONCEPTS OF MONOPOLY.
THE PRESENT ECONOMIC AND LEGAL VIEWS OF MONOPOLY AND COMPETITION
a. Competition and monopoly in the economic sense.
b. The competition intended by the Sherman Act.
c. The economic view of the effect of potential competition upon monopoly.
d. The economic view of the effect of substitute products upon monopoly.
PART I — CELLOPHANE.
A. DuPONT’S POSITION DOES NOT VIOLATE § 2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT.
1. DuPONT DOES NOT HAVE MONOPOLY POWER.
a. Plaintiff must establish duPont has sufficient power arbitrarily to raise prices or to…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mrs. Cordie Ola Fair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Atari Games Corporation and Tengen, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Nintendo of America, Inc., and Nintendo Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- American Football League v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Telex Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.