Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of Hauser

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 5, 1976No. 3987-1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

The petitioners, Larrien Phillips and Albert Hauser, Jr., seek review of an order permanently depriving both petitioners of all parental rights in and to their child, Albert Jeffrey Lee Hauser. The petitioners challenge findings of the trial court, assert that the child was not dependent under RCW 13.04.010, and that the permanent deprivation order should be reversed. The petitioner Albert Hauser, Jr., asserts that he was denied consideration of his individual fitness as a parent because of his sex. We find that clear, cogent, and convincing evidence supports the findings entered, concur with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Darrin v. GouldWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Re Adoption of LybbertWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re DayWashington Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Parental Rights to K.M.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. City of Seattle v. BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. B.S. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Schulz v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. In Re the Welfare of HagenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API