Legal Opinion

Purcell v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 1978No. 410-978, CA 8074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action at law in contract alleging that Multnomah County and the City of Portland agreed to pay plaintiff certain contingent supplemental pension benefits as part of his compensation as Director of Public Safety for the county.1 The case was tried to the court and judgment was entered against the county for $15,752, together with a declaration that defendant pay plaintiff future supplemental benefits in the amount of $492.27 per month. The trial court dismissed the action against the city. The county appeals.

The county makes several assignments of error which can be summarized as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKenna v. McHaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrow County Health District v. Account Control Consultant Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API